XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
XXXX
Website Navigation
The Issues
and
Proposed Solutions
( Website Homepage )
Understand the ELS Federal Tax Fraud Scheme
Legal Opinions and
Documents related to the
ELS Tax Fraud Scheme
Chronological List of
Website Documents
Washington State
Precedential
Railroad Right-of-Way
Opinions Thru Brown

There is massive corruption in our Courts.

by John Rasmussen

Please read a disclaimer for the statements I make on this website accusing judges, politicians and activists of criminal actions.



In my experience, there is massive corruption in our courts.

     In early 2000, I blew the whistle on a federal tax fraud scheme used in railbanking the BNSF East Lake Sammamish (ELS) right-of-way in King County, Washington. When evidence of the crime was presented in federal court, Ninth Circuit District Judge Barbara Jacobs Rothstein struck all the evidence and failed to refer the crime to federal prosecutors. She then issued a decision which hid the tax fraud scheme and protected its participants from federal tax fraud prosecution. In King County v. Rasmussen (2001), Rothstein denied my constitutional right to establish the facts in her court. With material facts in question, she illegally allowed herself summary judgment. This denied my right to a jury. She then ignored one hundred years of consistently applied common law and made up new law to use in deciding the issues. Judge Rothstein became a participant in the East Lake Sammamish federal tax fraud scheme with her dishonest actions from the bench. But, that was just the start of the massive corruption I experienced in our courts.
    (My statements describing wrongdoing or criminal actions on this webpage are a First Amendment expression of my opinion.)

     When Rothstein's dishonesty was appealed in 2002, the three judge Ninth Circuit appeals panel rubber stamped her opinion, and again denied my right to establish the facts of the case. King County v. Rasmussen (2002) is a criminal act from the bench. The full Ninth Circuit Court then refused to reestablish my constitutional rights in its denial of en banc consideration. Every judge in the United States Court of appeals for the Ninth Circuit refused to allow me to correct the contrived facts that Rothstein manufactured to justify her predetermined outcome to my lawsuit. The Ninth Circuit denied my constitutional right of due process. This wasn't a mistake. The dishonesty of the opinions in 2001 and 2002 are too obvious for this to be a mistake.
    (My statements describing wrongdoing or criminal actions on this webpage are a First Amendment expression of my opinion.)

     As a final insult, I was denied appeal by the United States Supreme Court. Appeals from the Ninth Circuit are the most overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court, yet the Supreme Court does nothing to protect Americans from this rogue and dishonest court. By taking only a small fraction of the cases appealed, and refusing to deal with the root cause, the Supreme Court establishes a "right" for Ninth Circuit judges to abandon the law and the Constitution. Our system of government insulates the judiciary from the political process. Our judges have used this insulation to grab power that was never granted to them. They do this by abandoning their oaths, abandoning their commitment to the Constitution and the law, and instead freely committing crimes from the bench. This is exactly the judicial misconduct that I describe on this website. Since we-the-people have little power to hold the judiciary responsible, we must depend on the judiciary is to police itself. For this to happen, it must start at the top with the United States Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court has failed to assume this responsibility.
    (My statements describing wrongdoing or criminal actions on this webpage are a First Amendment expression of my opinion.)

     In early 2004, I entered a complaint of judicial misconduct to the Chief Judge of the Ninth Circuit. Judge Schroeder dishonestly dismissed my complaint by stating that the issues that I brought with my complaint had already been resolved. Not true.
    (My statements describing wrongdoing or criminal actions on this webpage are a First Amendment expression of my opinion.)

     A sister lawsuit, bringing exactly the same property right issue, went through the Washington State courts. Chief Judge Cox of the Washington State Court of Appeals, Division One, used the dishonest Rothstein opinion as precedent in Ray v. King County (2004). Cox knew how dishonest that decision was. The Washington State Supreme Court then denied appeal. I believe the most dishonest decisions by courts of appeal are the cowardly refusal to consider blatantly dishonest lower court decisions. That is what the Washington State Supreme Court did with Ray v. King County. After observing the dishonest in Ray, its denial of appeal, and the other related moves by the judges of our Washington State Supreme Court, I ask the question: Did the judges of our Washington State Supreme Court intentionally participate in the East Lake Sammamish federal tax fraud scheme?
    (My statements describing wrongdoing or criminal actions on this webpage are a First Amendment expression of my opinion.)

It Seems that Judges have Formed the Strongest Labor Union in History.

     After the four year struggle for my rights in the courts, it is obvious to me that the most important priority for a judge is to protect his/her fellow judges. This includes covering up criminal activity by her/his fellow judges. This works well for judges because they can then count on their fellow judges to return the favor. Unfortunately, this doesn't work out so well for we-the-people because we lose our rights and our judicial process by their illegal actions.
    (My statements describing wrongdoing or criminal actions on this webpage are a First Amendment expression of my opinion.)

     This loyal support system by judges operates like an old fashioned labor union. Perhaps this is the strongest and most powerful “labor union” in history. Much of the public dislikes labor unions because they harm their company and irrationally support their weakest members. This is exactly what the Ninth Circuit judges have done with their irrational support of Barbara Rothstein's criminal opinion in King County v. Rasmussen (2001). In the case of this labor union of judges, the employer is we-the-people of the United States. In the same way a rogue labor union can destroy its employer, we-the-people seem to be unable to stop the criminal activity in this rogue labor union of judges. There actions are destroying the judicial branch of our government.
    (My statements describing wrongdoing or criminal actions on this webpage are a First Amendment expression of my opinion.)

What can be done?

     On this website I describe a criminal act committed from the bench by a federal judge. To cover up this crime, that federal judge denied my right to present my case in court. She denied my constitutional right of due process. The three judge federal appeals paned knew exactly what had happened, and chose to support their dishonest colleague rather than grant my constitutional rights in court. This injustice was appealed to the full Ninth Circuit federal court. Every judge in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit chose to support the dishonesty of their fellow federal judges and deny my constitutional right to present my case to a jury. The States Supreme Court was apparently too busy to correct the Ninth Circuit, or just didn't care. This website describes, in great detail, these criminal acts. When judges conspire to destroy the rights of a party in order to protect a fellow judge, as they have done here, they destroy the law and the codes by which we live. This will destroy our Nation. This is treason.
    (My statements describing wrongdoing or criminal actions on this webpage are a First Amendment expression of my opinion.)

     On this website I describe a criminal act committed from the bench by a federal judge. To cover up this crime, that federal judge denied my right to present my case in court. She denied my constitutional right of due process. The three judge federal appeals paned knew exactly what had happened, and chose to support their dishonest colleague rather than grant my constitutional rights in court. This injustice was appealed to the full Ninth Circuit federal court. Every judge in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit chose to support the dishonesty of their fellow federal judges and deny my constitutional right to present my case to a jury. The States Supreme Court was apparently too busy to correct the Ninth Circuit, or just didn't care. This website describes, in great detail, these criminal acts. When judges conspire to destroy the rights of a party in order to protect a fellow judge, as they have done here, they destroy the law and the codes by which we live. This will destroy our Nation. This is treason.
    (My statements describing wrongdoing or criminal actions on this webpage are a First Amendment expression of my opinion.)



Reference:

    Understand how Judges Protect their Fellow Judges at the expense of the Constitution and the laws.

    View my March 31, 2009 Public Letter to the Judges of the Washington State Supreme Court.

    View King County v. Rasmussen (2001) annotated with brief comments.

    View King County v. Rasmussen (2001) annotated with detailed comments.

    View King County v. Rasmussen (2002) annotated with brief comments.

    View King County v. Rasmussen (2002) annotated with detailed comments.

    View Ray v. King County (2004) annotated with brief comments.

    View Ray v. King County (2004) annotated with detailed comments.

    View my 2004 Complaint of Judicial Misconduct, and denial by Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Schroeder.

    Understand the East Lake Sammamish federal tax fraud scheme.

    View the Evidence of the East Lake Sammamish federal tax fraud scheme.

    View an analysis of Who Participated in the East Lake Sammamish federal tax fraud scheme.

    View my Whistle Blower Letter to Ron Sims and Council in February 2000, outlining the ELS federal tax fraud scheme.

    "Lie, Stonewall and Slander", how King County deals with citizens who challenge its actions.

    "Theft-by-Community", how the community in King County stole the ELS land from its residents.

    Norm Maleng's "Legal Theory" the legal excuse by the Prosecutor for accepting the phony donation of ELS land.

    View a study of how Norm Maleng Covered-up King County's Participation in the ELS federal tax fraud scheme

    Understand how the Rails-to-Trails Conservancy works against the rights of Americans.